crimes

Secrets of the housekeeper

It was about 8pm on Sunday 17 December 1922 and an 18 year old Ruby Anderson had been screaming out in pain for about an hour. Her father, Thomas, no doubt worried, went to fetch the horse and trap from the paddock to take Ruby into Geelong Hospital. As it was a Sunday, there would be no doctor available for a house call, especially at this late hour.

Thomas was a widower, his wife Sophia had died three years earlier. He was now alone and was left caring for his two daughters – Ruby and twelve year old Violet – his eldest son Leslie lived close by with his wife. Thomas was a farmer at Sparrowvale, about five miles from Geelong; a large acreage that was the original Geelong Racecourse and location for the early Marshall Railway. Thomas and his daughters would likely have occupied one of the purpose built employees cottages on the land leased by the Geelong Harbour Trust for the purpose of land cultivation, irrigation and running stock.

Ruby had been the housekeeper for her father for six years. She would cook and clean and her father would allow her out to spend time with her lady friends a few nights a week, often returning home after 11pm. Thomas had no reason to believe that his eldest daughter was hiding anything from him and she had not once indicated that she had been feeling unwell. But on that Sunday night when her father was racing to get the horse he was stopped before he could get far out the door. Violet yelled for her father to ‘come quick…Ruby got a baby’. Thomas ran straight back into the house and moved Ruby to his bed. Meanwhile, Ruby had asked her old brother Leslie to find some castor oil for the pain. As he left the house he heard the ‘squeal of a youngster…it sounded like a baby’s cry’. Confused, he rushed back into the bedroom where Ruby was, thinking that’s where the cry had come from. Upon re-entering the bedroom Leslie saw ‘blood all over the floor and a baby underneath the bed’. An almost identical depiction of what Thomas has seen when he rushed into Ruby’s room. Leslie ‘struck a match and saw the baby under the bed…the baby had its throat cut’.
Separately, both men asked Ruby what she had done. She told her father she had no idea what had happened and looked at him as if she had no idea who he was. What is possible Ruby was mentally unstable and had no recollection of what she had done to her newborn son?

Detective Sickerdick's interview notes from VPRS 30/P0, Unit 1994, Item 53.

Detective Sickerdick's interview notes from VPRS 30/P0, Unit 1994, Item 53.

Soon after the discovery of the newborn baby boy, Thomas alerted the police. Detective Frederick Sickerdick from Geelong arrived at the house two hours after the events took place and saw the horrific, bloody scene. The child with afterbirth still attached was lying on the floor and he noticed a knife covered in blood was placed on a shelf above the bed. Detective Sickerdick questioned Ruby about her memories of the events which had obviously recently taken place in the bedroom and made notes about his findings. The Detective’s impressions of the house in which Thomas and his two daughters were residing painted a sad picture when he stated that it ‘was in a frightfully filthy condition consisting of very little furniture and no home comforts’. He also noted that Thomas had no control over his eldest daughter who ‘visited Geelong 3 or 4 nights during a week and her company whilst in Geelong were girls who have a bad reputation, she would walk home and arrive there at all hours’. Asked who the father of the baby was, Ruby’s story changed when initially she told the Detective that ‘some elderly man was responsible for her trouble, she did not know his name nor did she know where he lived’. Although, further into her interview she told Detective Sickerdick ‘that a youth named Russell who [was] 18 years of age resided at Barramunga [was] the father of her child’.

Two months later, in February 1923, Ruby May Anderson was to stand trial in Geelong on the charge of murder. Her father, brother and sister all made statements about the unknown pregnancy and subsequent cold-blooded murder of a newborn baby, only a few minutes old. Doctor Frederick Wallace, a resident surgeon at the Geelong Hospital undertook the post-mortem and testified that the cause of death for the newborn male child was ‘caused by haemorrhage and shock’, that there was an ‘extensive incision transversely across the front of the neck’. There was conjecture about whether the birth had affected Ruby’s mental condition, which was Doctor Wallace said was, ‘very frequent in females at that particular time…the mind might possibly take some time to become normal [after birth]’. Asked at the end of the trial if Ruby wanted to make a statement about the events, to which she bluntly answered, ‘I have nothing to say’.

Ruby was initially sent to Geelong Gaol before being transferred to Coburg’s Female Prison and finally ending up at the Melbourne Gaol. After spending less than two months behind prison walls, Ruby Anderson was released to freedom ‘by special authority’.

Phoebe, May 2018

Ruby Anderson prisoner photo, c1923

Ruby Anderson prisoner photo, c1923

 

Sources:

PROV, VPRS 30/P0, Unit 1994, Item 53

PROV, VPRS 516/P2, Unit 14, Prisoner no. 7492

Geelong Advertiser

Heritage Council Victoria, Victorian Heritage Database

 

Floating body of evidence

***WARNING: this post contains confronting and/or upsetting themes***

‘The nails and cuticles were coming off. The hair loose from the scalp, patches of greenish brown all over the body…the string of her nightcap was tied round her throat tolerably tight’. This was how Catherine Lyfield was found when her body was exhumed from the Merri River near Dennington, south-west Victoria. Lying in the outhouse of the Shamrock Hotel in Port Fairy where the inquest was held, the middle aged woman was severely decomposed with a number of loose teeth and a damaged skull.   

Henry Lyfield was a dairy farmer from Rosebrook, about five kilometres north-east of the seaside town of Port Fairy. Henry’s first wife Sarah had died in 1864 at the age of 43 years old; their eldest living child was sixteen and their youngest child was just a year old. Three months later the 36 year old father of eight re-married. His second wife was Catherine Harper, a nineteen year old servant girl.

'Articles found on body'. VPRS 30/P0, Crimal Trial Brief, Unit 1121, Item 619.

'Articles found on body'. VPRS 30/P0, Crimal Trial Brief, Unit 1121, Item 619.

Caroline Snell was Henry’s third child and had moved back into the family home with her father and stepmother after her husband Williams’ death. Caroline and her thirteen year old daughter Elizabeth joined her older sister Jane back at the family dairy farm. The three would often overhear Henry and Catherine fighting, with it frequently becoming violent. At least once Henry began hitting his wife to the ground, choking her and threatening to kill her.

One evening in mid-October 1896, Caroline, Elizabeth and Jane were all in bed by 8 o’clock; the three sharing a room next door to Henry and Catherine. In the early hours of the following morning the women were woken by the sounds of low screams. Thirteen year old Elizabeth, ‘heard the sound once, like something hitting against the [adjoining] wall…a noise like somebody having a struggle’, shortly followed by the sounds of heavy footsteps. By 5 o’clock that morning the three women and Henry went about work as normal milking the cows, upon their return to the house Henry handed a bundle of soiled clothes to Caroline to wash, stating that, ‘here are the clothes, she will never want them again’.
Peering into the other bedroom at the front of the house, usually shared by the couple, Elizabeth spotted Catherine lying on the floor, covered up, unmoving.

The following evening Caroline was awoken by the sound of footsteps in the front room. Claiming that she ‘heard a noise like someone dragging a heavy thing about the floor towards the front outside door’, she went to inspect that morning to no avail. Walking in to the shed the next day to collect some potatoes for the family’s next meal, Caroline noticed ‘something covered over with straw and two bags…and saw a part of the face of a human being’. Caroline had uncovered the body of her stepmother Catherine.  

Meanwhile, Henry was going about his daily life, telling people that his wife had walked out on him and he’d not heard a word from her.
By 26 October 1896, friends and peers were having to identify the remains of Catherine and a post-mortem examination was being undertaken on her mangled and decomposing remains.

In February the following year the case had to be moved from the local county court in Warrnambool to the Supreme Court in Melbourne. Henry Lyfield and his daughter Caroline Snell had been charged with the murder of Catherine Lyfield and had both pleaded insanity. Caroline had confessed to assisting her father in murdering her stepmother after he threatened her. Henry was said to have been annoyed at his wife for keeping a strict eye on him and his movements with his daughter. Whilst beside her bed praying, Henry moved behind his wife and ‘threw a string round her neck. She struggled and screamed’ and Caroline ‘struck her with a hammer’. Killed, she was then taken to the Merri River and her body dumped.
Catherine’s need to keep a close eye on his husband was not because she was a possessive wife, it was because she was aware of the incestuous relationship that was going on between father and daughter.
During the proceedings much more came to light than domestic violence and the murder of Henry’s second wife, Catherine.  Journalists, sitting in on court proceedings reported that ‘Lyfield, according to the testimony of his own daughter and granddaughter, [was] a triple murderer, and [had] habitually been on terms of criminal relations first with one and subsequently with both of them…two children [had been] born as the result of the incestuous intercourse with the daughter [and] the inhuman father is alleged to have killed them in cold blood and buried them on this farm’, the third and only surviving child grew up believing her father was William Snell.

Henry Lyfields mugshot, 1897. VPRS 516/P1, Unit 51.

Henry Lyfields mugshot, 1897. VPRS 516/P1, Unit 51.

On 15 February 1897, Henry Lyfield was found ‘not guilty on the grounds of insanity’. He died in 1901 at the age of 71 years old of natural causes in Melbourne Gaol.
Caroline Snell was ‘unable to plead on grounds of insanity’, and in March 1917, twenty years after first stepping into the Melbourne Gaol Female Prison, she was transferred to Melbourne Benevolent Asylum.

Caroline Snell's mugshot, 1897. VPRS 516/P2, Unit 12

Caroline Snell's mugshot, 1897. VPRS 516/P2, Unit 12

Phoebe, April 2018

Sources:

PROV, VPRS 30/P0, Unit 1121, Item 619

PROV, VPRS 515/P1, Unit 51, Henry Lyfield, Prisoner no. 27794

PROV, VPRS 516/P2, Unit 12, Caroline Snell, Prison no. 6495

Evening News (NSW)

Western Champion and General Advertiser for the Central-Western Districts (Queensland)

Horsham Times (Victoria)

Maryborough Chronicle, Wide Bay and Burnett Advertiser (Queensland)

National Advocate (NSW)

Adelaide Observer (SA)

Ballarat Star (Victoria)

South Australia Register (SA)

Prostitutes and vagabonds

Prostitution. Vagrancy. Insufficient means. Just a few of the punishable crimes Phoebe Harris was imprisoned for in her short life.

Phoebe Harris’ story is not an unusual one for the time. That doesn’t mean it is any less sad. Born somewhere between 1862 and 1865 in England, by the time she was in her early-twenties, Phoebe was charged with her first offence and sentenced to two months of hard labour. Four months after that first charge, she was again sentenced to two months hard labour. In fact, Phoebe’s prison record is a large and varied list of her movements between police stations, court houses and gaol’s over almost forty years. 

Phoebe Harris' mug shot. Image from female prison register, PROV, VPRS 516/P2, Unit 9, p. 226.

Phoebe Harris' mug shot. Image from female prison register, PROV, VPRS 516/P2, Unit 9, p. 226.

In 1885 Phoebe found herself locked up in the Horsham police station for using ‘obscene language’. By 6 o’clock the next morning, only an hour after being checked on, Phoebe was missing from the lock up yard where the ‘staple of the door having been wrenched off by the means of an iron bar’. Her husband, Abraham had been seen loitering around the yards. Phoebe was found and re-arrested three hours later and sentenced to two months for obscene language and a further six months for escaping.

After this, Phoebe’s register is a litany of offences. Crimes which held terms of anywhere from one month and a fine of a few pounds for soliciting prostitution, to six months for ‘invisible’ or ‘insufficient means’, to twelve months of hard labour for larceny. She frequented the pages of the Victorian government police gazettes and newspapers for these offences, which were always followed by the words – ‘repeatedly convicted’. A known criminal around Melbourne, who spent her whole adult life being so poor that she was continually charged with having no money to live by and thus turning to prostitution to survive and then being charged for that.

In August 1915 the Truth reported that ‘Harris, who has an impediment in her speech was once a tailoress, but now she is known in official circles as “Big Phoebe”, one of Fitzroy’s many frail flossies’ was charged with having insufficient means and was known ‘to be a common prostitute’.

Victorian government gazette, 19 September 1908.

Victorian government gazette, 19 September 1908.

On paper Phoebe led a sad life of imprisonment, which was an eternal cycle that continued to put her in gaol. The one consistency in her life at least gave her a place to sleep and food to eat, although not desirable.

In April 1921, Phoebe was sentenced to a further twelve months imprisonment in the female prison in Coburg (Pentridge). Less than seven months later in early November 1921, Phoebe Harris, the brown-eyed brunette and former tailoress and prison laundry attendant was finally set free from gaol when she collapsed after a ‘fainting fit’ and was carried to the hospital. After not regaining consciousness for four days, Phoebe eventually died of advanced kidney disease at the age of 53 years on 6 November.

Do you have a criminal in your family tree that you would like to learn more about? Contact us today to see how we can help you!

Phoebe

Sources:

  • Phoebe Harris (AKA Phoebe Josephs) prison register, No. 5190 - PROV, VPRS 516/P2, Vol. 9, Pg. 226
  • Phoebe Harris inquest - PROV, VPRS 24/P0, Unit 1014, Item 1921/1140
  • Victorian police gazette
  • The Herald (Melbourne), 22 June 1909, p. 5
  • Truth (Melbourne), 21 August 1915, p. 3
  • Argus (Melbourne), 19 December 1908, p. 20
  • The Age (Melbourne), 19 December 1908, p. 16
  • Argus (Melbourne), 3 January 1885, p. 12